Skip to main content
July/August 2022 cover
Foreign Affairs Magazine Homepage
Subscribe
Explore Subscribe
  • All Articles
  • Books & Reviews
  • Podcast
  • Anthologies
  • Author Directory
  • This Day in History
  • Events
  • Biden Administration
  • War in Ukraine
  • Coronavirus
  • Climate Change
  • Cybersecurity
  • Nationalism
  • Democratization
  • Economics
  • Globalization
  • Migration
  • U.S. Foreign Policy
  • War & Military Strategy
  • United States
  • Ukraine
  • Russia
  • China
  • Iran
  • North Korea
  • United Kingdom
  • India
  • Afghanistan
  • Ethiopia
  • Essays
  • Snapshots
  • Articles with Audio
  • Capsule Reviews
  • Review Essays
  • Ask the Experts
  • Reading Lists
  • Interviews
  • Responses
  • 1920s
  • 1930s
  • 1940s
  • 1950s
  • 1960s
  • 1970s
  • 1980s
  • 1990s
  • 2000s
  • 2010s
  • 2020s
  • Newsletters
  • Customer Service
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Subscriber Resources
  • Feedback
  • Institutional Subscriptions
  • Gift a Subscription
  • Centennial
  • Contact
  • Advertise

Follow Us

Foreign Affairs Magazine Homepage
Explore
My Account Sign In

  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Books & Reviews
  • Anthologies
  • Podcast
  • Newsletters
Search
Subscribe
Subscribe Sign in
Subscribe to newsletter
No, thanks
May/June 2020 Issue

The Fire Next Time

The Fire Next Time
  • May/June 2020
  • 01 The Climate Club
  • 02 The Paths to Net Zero
  • 03 The Strategic Case for U.S. Climate Leadership
  • 04 A Foreign Policy for the Climate
  • 05 The Unlikely Environmentalists
  • 06 Building a Resilient Planet
  • 07 The Climate Debt

What’s Inside

Wise public policy can still limit the scale of the eventual climate disaster.

May/June 2020
Sign in and save to read later
Share
Print this article
Save
Share on Twitter
Share on Facebook
Send by email
Get a link
Request Reprint Permissions

Professionals warn and plan, amateurs scoff and ignore them, and by the time a crisis arrives, it’s too late to do more than react and suffer. 

Nothing about this story is novel; the COVID-19 pandemic is only the latest in a long series of unnecessary catastrophes. We can’t go back now and regain those precious early months during the winter, using them to aggressively test and quarantine and contain the outbreak. We can’t retrospectively conjure up a functioning global public health infrastructure, effective crisis-management systems, and leaders who put lives over pride. But at least we can learn the lessons.

Climate change is also a crisis. It is unfolding more slowly than its pandemic cousin but will have even vaster consequences. The world had a chance to tackle it early but blew that through decades of denial. Much future damage is baked in already. Yet wise public policy can still limit the scale of the eventual disaster—if everybody takes the challenge seriously across the board now, as our lead package this issue explains.

International climate change agreements need to be restructured to reduce incentives for free-riding, writes the Nobel Prize–winning economist William Nordhaus. And a strong global push to develop and adopt low-emission energy technologies could limit future temperature increases, argues a team of top researchers. 

Washington should see climate change not only as an environmental risk but also as a strategic opportunity, suggest two former Republican secretaries of state, James Baker and George Shultz, with Ted Halstead, and capitalize on the early U.S. lead in green technology. John Podesta and Todd Stern, who handled climate policy in the Obama administration, offer a road map for overhauling American foreign policy and institutions to rise to the occasion.

Rebecca Henderson shows why business leaders are starting to drive a green agenda rather than obstruct it. Kathy Baughman McLeod notes the crucial role of local and community leadership in fostering simple behavioral changes with powerful collective effects (the environmental equivalents of hand washing). And Mohamed Adow points out that any climate effort must include major development assistance for poor countries, since they are the most vulnerable to the crisis, the least responsible for it, and the key to its solution.

We failed to stop the sickness this time. But we can do better with the fire next time. 

—Gideon Rose, Editor

More:
Climate Change

Most-Read Articles

NATO’s Hard Road Ahead

The Greatest Threats to Alliance Unity Will Come After the Madrid Summit

Charles A. Kupchan

The Real Key to Victory in Ukraine

Why Sustaining the Fight Is Everything in a War of Attrition

Kirstin J. H. Brathwaite and Margarita Konaev

Can Putin Survive?

The Lessons of the Soviet Collapse

Vladislav Zubok

The Surprising Success of the Truce in Yemen

Building on Diplomacy Requires Decoding the Houthis

Peter Salisbury and Alexander Weissenburger

Get the Magazine

Save up to 55%

on Foreign Affairs magazine!
Subscribe

Foreign Affairs

Weekly Newsletter

Get in-depth analysis delivered right to your inbox
About
About Us Staff Events Work at Foreign Affairs Podcast
Contact
Customer Service Contact Us Submissions Permissions Advertise Press Center Leave Us Feedback Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription
Subscriptions Group Subscriptions My Account Give a Gift Donate Download iOS App Newsletters Download Android App
Follow
Graduate School Forum
Council on Foreign Relations

From the
publishers of
Foreign Affairs

NATO Countries Signal Resolve at Summit: What Does It Mean for Russia?
by Thomas Graham
Cyber Week in Review: June 30, 2022
by Adam Segal
Pro-Democracy Movement Persists in Sudan
by Author:Michelle Gavin

Published by the Council on Foreign Relations

Privacy Policy Terms of Use

©2022 Council on Foreign Relations, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Loading Loading