Skip to main content
January/February 2023 cover
Foreign Affairs Magazine Homepage
Subscribe
Explore Subscribe
  • All Articles
  • Books & Reviews
  • Podcast
  • Anthologies
  • Audio Content
  • Author Directory
  • This Day in History
  • Events
  • Biden Administration
  • War in Ukraine
  • Coronavirus
  • Climate Change
  • Cybersecurity
  • Nationalism
  • Democratization
  • Economics
  • Globalization
  • Migration
  • U.S. Foreign Policy
  • War & Military Strategy
  • United States
  • Ukraine
  • Russia
  • China
  • Iran
  • North Korea
  • United Kingdom
  • India
  • Afghanistan
  • Ethiopia
  • View All Regions
  • Essays
  • Snapshots
  • Capsule Reviews
  • Review Essays
  • Ask the Experts
  • Reading Lists
  • Interviews
  • Responses
  • 1920s
  • 1930s
  • 1940s
  • 1950s
  • 1960s
  • 1970s
  • 1980s
  • 1990s
  • 2000s
  • 2010s
  • 2020s
  • Newsletters
  • Customer Service
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Subscriber Resources
  • Feedback
  • Institutional Subscriptions
  • Gift a Subscription
  • Contact
  • Advertise

Follow Us

Foreign Affairs Magazine Homepage
Explore
My Account Sign In

  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Books & Reviews
  • Anthologies
  • Podcast
  • Newsletters
Search
Subscribe
Subscribe Sign in
Subscribe to newsletter
No, thanks
January/February 2021 Issue

Can America Recover?

Can America Recover?
  • January/February 2021
  • 01 The Can-Do Power
  • 02 The Crisis Opportunity
  • 03 To Stop a Pandemic
  • 04 The Reconstruction of America
  • 05 Monopoly Versus Democracy
  • 06 Desperate Times, Desperate Measures
  • 07 Cleaning House

What’s Inside

What does history say about the possibilities for national renewal?

January/February 2021
Sign in and save to read later
Share
Print this article
Save
Send by email
Share on Twitter
Share on Facebook
Share on LinkedIn
Get a link
Request Reprint Permissions

What comes after crisis? Can the United States really “build back better”? And what does history say about the possibilities for national renewal?

The first articles in this issue’s package propose a radical experiment: try an administration with both character and competence. Samantha Power argues that Joe Biden’s team can earn legitimacy and respect by getting the pandemic under control, fighting corruption, and reopening to the world. Jason Furman proposes a two-stage economic plan, with immediate measures designed to help the unemployed and keep the recovery going followed by broader structural reforms. And Jennifer Nuzzo shows how to rethink global health security so as to prevent future catastrophes.

The remaining articles seek guidance from the past, exploring previous national attempts to deal with structural racism, inequality, economic crisis, and democratic regression. David Blight, writing on the Civil War and Reconstruction; Zephyr Teachout, on the Gilded Age and progressivism; Meg Jacobs, on the Great Depression and the New Deal; and John Lawrence, on Watergate and the reforms that followed, all agree: progress is possible, but always slow, hard-won, and partial, with unfinished struggles passed on from one generation to the next.

Seventy years ago, the United States was in trouble. Then, as now, Washington was gripped by a wave of populist demagoguery, with Wisconsin Senator Joseph McCarthy ranting about treasonous deep-state conspiracies. China was also on the march—back then, quite literally, pushing bedraggled UN forces down and maybe off the Korean Peninsula. But in late December 1950, the commanding general of the U.S. Eighth Army was killed in a car accident, and history flipped.

The new commander, Matthew Ridgway, realized that the military situation in Korea was dire but salvageable. He restored professional standards, replaced unfit officers, rebuilt morale, and instilled a sense of purpose. Sure enough, within months, his forces had pushed the enemy back and earned a stalemate, which was eventually translated into an armistice.

A few years later, still chasing his imagined demons, McCarthy took on the U.S. Army in televised hearings. The American public watched closely and, fever passing, decided that decency was a good thing after all.

Character and competence have saved the country before. They could again.

—Gideon Rose, Editor

More:
United States Health U.S. Foreign Policy Law Coronavirus

Most-Read Articles

How Russia Decides to Go Nuclear

Deciphering the Way Moscow Handles Its Ultimate Weapon

Kristin Ven Bruusgaard

How Russians Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the War

The Pliant Majority Sustaining Putin’s Rule

Andrei Kolesnikov

Iran’s Hard-Liners Are Winning

How Months of Protest Forged an Even More Intransigent Regime

Vali Nasr

The Third Intifada?

Why the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Might Boil Over Again

Daniel Byman

Get the Magazine

Save up to 55%

on Foreign Affairs magazine!
Subscribe

Foreign Affairs

Weekly Newsletter

Get in-depth analysis delivered right to your inbox
About
About Us Staff Events Work at Foreign Affairs Podcast
Contact
Customer Service Contact Us Submissions Permissions Advertise Press Center Leave Us Feedback Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription
Subscriptions Group Subscriptions My Account Give a Gift Donate Download iOS App Newsletters Download Android App
Follow
Graduate School Forum
Council on Foreign Relations

From the
publishers of
Foreign Affairs

Nigeria Security Tracker Weekly Update: January 28-February 3
by CFR Africa Program
U.S. Leadership on Ukraine Is Increasing European Dependence
by Author:Liana Fix
What’s at Stake in Pakistan’s Power Crisis
by Noah Berman

Published by the Council on Foreign Relations

Privacy Policy Terms of Use

©2023 Council on Foreign Relations, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Loading Loading