Skip to main content
March/April 2023 cover
Foreign Affairs Magazine Homepage
Subscribe
Explore Subscribe
  • All Articles
  • Books & Reviews
  • Podcast
  • Anthologies
  • Audio Content
  • Author Directory
  • This Day in History
  • Events
  • Biden Administration
  • War in Ukraine
  • Coronavirus
  • Climate Change
  • Cybersecurity
  • Nationalism
  • Democratization
  • Economics
  • Globalization
  • Migration
  • U.S. Foreign Policy
  • War & Military Strategy
  • United States
  • Ukraine
  • Russia
  • China
  • Iran
  • North Korea
  • United Kingdom
  • India
  • Afghanistan
  • Ethiopia
  • View All Regions
  • Essays
  • Snapshots
  • Capsule Reviews
  • Review Essays
  • Ask the Experts
  • Reading Lists
  • Interviews
  • Responses
  • 1920s
  • 1930s
  • 1940s
  • 1950s
  • 1960s
  • 1970s
  • 1980s
  • 1990s
  • 2000s
  • 2010s
  • 2020s
  • Newsletters
  • Customer Service
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Subscriber Resources
  • Feedback
  • Institutional Subscriptions
  • Gift a Subscription
  • Contact
  • Advertise

Follow Us

Foreign Affairs Magazine Homepage
Explore
My Account Sign In

  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Books & Reviews
  • Anthologies
  • Podcast
  • Newsletters
Search
Subscribe
Subscribe Sign in
Subscribe to newsletter
No, thanks
March/April 2020 Issue

Come Home, America?

Come Home, America?
  • March/April 2020
  • 01 The Folly of Retrenchment
  • 02 The Price of Primacy
  • 03 The New Spheres of Influence
  • 04 Reality Check
  • 05 Learning to Live With Despots
  • 06 Getting to Less

What’s Inside

The United States is questioning the global role it once embraced.

March/April 2020
Sign in and save to read later
Share
Print this article
Save
Send by email
Share on Twitter
Share on Facebook
Share on LinkedIn
Get a link
Request Reprint Permissions

Wealth and power breed ambition, in countries as in people. Nations on the rise dream big, dare greatly, and see failure as a challenge to be overcome. The same process works in reverse: nations on the wane scale back their ambitions, cut losses, and see failure as a portent to be heeded. 

Feeling down these days, the United States is questioning the global role it once embraced. The empire that Washington absent-mindedly acquired during flusher times now seems to cost more than it’s worth, and many want to shed the burden. What that might involve is the subject of this issue’s lead package. 

Thomas Wright and Stephen Wertheim kick off the debate with strong statements of the central arguments on each side. In general, Wright notes, American alliances, security guarantees, and international economic leadership over recent generations have been a great success. It makes sense to prune lesser commitments, but certainly not to abandon Washington’s essential global role. On the contrary, says Wertheim: it is precisely the notion of American primacy that needs to go. Instead of policing the world with endless military interventions, Washington should withdraw from much of the greater Middle East, rein in the “war on terror,” rely on diplomacy instead of force, and concentrate its attention on trying to steer the global economy toward fairer and greener pastures.

Three tough-minded pieces offer different ways Washington could lower its sights. Graham Allison suggests dealing with the loss of hegemony by accepting spheres of influence. Jennifer Lind and Daryl Press favor limiting U.S. objectives to whatever the domestic and international markets will bear. And Stephen Krasner advises settling for good enough governance in the world. Lastly, Kathleen Hicks throws cold water on hopes (or fears) of any dramatic defense cuts, explaining what it would actually take to reduce military spending and why it’s so much easier said than done.

Similar calls for retrenchment were heard half a century ago, when the United States was at another low ebb in its global fortunes—facing declining relative power, increasing isolationism, a lost war in the periphery, a scandal-ridden president under siege. But just a few years later, after some creative strategy and diplomacy, the country had extricated itself from Vietnam, reshaped the global balance of power, reestablished its position in Asia, and become the dominant force in the Middle East. And although it took a while, the U.S. economy ultimately rose to the challenge posed by increased international competition and came out stronger for it. Could such miracles repeat themselves, or is it finally time for America to come home?

—Gideon Rose, Editor

Most-Read Articles

The Case for a Security Guarantee for Ukraine

How to Protect the Country—Without NATO Membership

Lise Morjé Howard and Michael O’Hanlon

Iraq and the Pathologies of Primacy

The Flawed Logic That Produced the War Is Alive and Well

Stephen Wertheim

Why the Press Failed on Iraq

And How One Team of Reporters Got It Right

John Walcott

Don’t Panic About Taiwan

Alarm Over a Chinese Invasion Could Become a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy

Jessica Chen Weiss

Get the Magazine

Save up to 55%

on Foreign Affairs magazine!
Subscribe

Foreign Affairs

Weekly Newsletter

Get in-depth analysis delivered right to your inbox
About
About Us Staff Events Work at Foreign Affairs Podcast
Contact
Customer Service Contact Us Submissions Permissions Advertise Press Center Leave Us Feedback Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription
Subscriptions Institutional Subscriptions My Account Give a Gift Donate Download iOS App Newsletters Download Android App
Follow
Graduate School Forum
Council on Foreign Relations

From the
publishers of
Foreign Affairs

North Korea’s Foreign Policy: The Kim Jong-un Regime in a Hostile World
by Editor:Scott A. Snyder
Zimbabwe Limps Toward Elections
by Michelle Gavin
The Dangers of a New Russian Proposal for a UN Convention on International Information Security

Published by the Council on Foreign Relations

Privacy Policy Terms of Use

©2023 Council on Foreign Relations, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Loading Loading