A woman walks past an election poster of Green Movement leader Mousavi.
Damir Sagolj / Courtesy Reuters

In his July 31 article "Tehran Takedown," Michael Ledeen, Freedom Scholar at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, argues that both threatening war and continuing to impose sanctions are unattractive options for Western governments' responses to the Iranian nuclear program. Ledeen instead proposes that the United States promote regime change in Iran in order to topple the current system and to replace it with more moderate figures. Ledeen is right to urge U.S. support for democratic change in Iran, but wrong in several of his key assumptions. 

For one, Ledeen asserts that sanctions failed in Iraq and therefore won't

This article is part of our premium archives.

To continue reading and get full access to our entire archive, you must subscribe.

Subscribe