These books' titles cry out their contention about the Iran-Contra scandal. Secord, the ultimate can-do military man, came to those events after a career of adventures spanning the "secret war" in Laos in the late 1960s through the Iranian hostage crisis of 1979-80. He drops intriguing tidbits about George Bush's role and Oliver North's shortcomings as an overreaching "field officer" zealously implementing the boss's wishes. Abrams, by contrast, is laser-focused; his is a searing psychological account of plea bargaining with Judge Walsh, the special prosecutor. Secord's apologia--that Iran-Contra's status as " 'offline' from the congressional viewpoint" was no different from operations set in motion by FDR or Lincoln-misses the point: however FDR's actions are regarded, our constitutional standards have evolved since. Yet it is not necessary to accept Abrams' argument (or Bush's justification for his pardons)--that deceiving Congress in pursuit of a patriotic cause is no misdeed--to recognize the awkwardness of trying to adjudicate collisions between the executive branch and Congress through criminal proceedings that sometimes trivialize the issues while perhaps brutalizing the participants.
Get the latest book reviews delivered to your inbox.