The rhetorical formula is familiar: breathless paragraphs (a few of normal length followed by an ominous one-sentence kicker), interviews with odd and interesting experts (war heroes dying of cancer, special forces veterans who have seen it all, hyperkinetic journalists on the electronic warfare beat) and scads of seemingly recondite facts (e.g., the number of shells fired by the British against Egyptian forts in 1881). When applied to the topic of war, the result is a book that contains any number of inaccurate or sloppy generalizations (an F-117 with one bomb can supposedly do what it took 4,500 B-17s to do in World War II) about war's past and present and probably, therefore, about its future. U.S. soldiers in remarkably large numbers, however, are reading the book, which suggests two things: first, military people sense that some large change is afoot; second, the usual constellation of defense analysts has not yet characterized it very well.
In This Review
In This Review
Most Read Articles
The Real Immigration Crisis
The Problem Is Not Too Many, but Too Few
America’s Original Identity Politics
Rich Lowry’s Flawed Case for Nationalism
Why Latin America Was Primed to Explode
Economic Malaise, More Than Foreign Meddling, Explains the Outpouring of Rage
The New German Question
What Happens When Europe Comes Apart?
The Ayatollah’s Den of Espionage
How Iran Came to See Its Revolutionary Core as Compromised