If the logic of collective action seeks to answer how groups of self-interested individuals can cooperate for benign purposes like moneymaking, where group and individual rewards do not correspond, the logic of group conflict asks why they can cohere for evil purposes like ethnic cleansing. The author, using examples of conflict like Bosnia and Rwanda, argues that group interests coincide with individual ones properly understood. But, rather than stretching the concept of individual self-interest in this fashion, one can move beyond the model of behavior implicit in rational choice theory to a more complex understanding of human motivations--something that can be done without resorting to primordialist arguments that everything arises out of deep-seated drives. The author also attacks recent communitarian theorists in favor of strict liberal universalism without taking seriously the importance of nonexclusive, voluntary community as a counterweight to liberal individualism.
In This Review
In This Review
Most Read Articles
Coming Soon to the United Nations: Chinese Leadership and Authoritarian Values
As Washington Steps Back, Beijing Will Take Charge
The American Working Man Still Isn’t Working
Our Economic Recovery Has Left Many Behind
Taiwan’s Defense Strategy Doesn’t Make Military Sense
But It Does Make Political Sense
What Would It Take for Iran’s President to Meet With Trump?
Tehran Needs to Know Washington’s Word Counts for Something
To Counter China, Out-Invent It
Trump’s Trade War Ignores the Real Threat From Beijing