If the logic of collective action seeks to answer how groups of self-interested individuals can cooperate for benign purposes like moneymaking, where group and individual rewards do not correspond, the logic of group conflict asks why they can cohere for evil purposes like ethnic cleansing. The author, using examples of conflict like Bosnia and Rwanda, argues that group interests coincide with individual ones properly understood. But, rather than stretching the concept of individual self-interest in this fashion, one can move beyond the model of behavior implicit in rational choice theory to a more complex understanding of human motivations--something that can be done without resorting to primordialist arguments that everything arises out of deep-seated drives. The author also attacks recent communitarian theorists in favor of strict liberal universalism without taking seriously the importance of nonexclusive, voluntary community as a counterweight to liberal individualism.
In This Review
In This Review
Most Read Articles
Why the Strait of Hormuz Is Still the World’s Most Important Chokepoint
And Why the United States Should Guarantee Its Security
Trump’s Incendiary Rhetoric Is Only Accelerating Immigration
The Crisis at the Border Is of Washington’s Own Making
When Stalin Faced Hitler
Who Fooled Whom?
How America Lost Faith in Expertise
And Why That's a Giant Problem
Can Greenland Win Independence By Selling Melted Ice?
The World’s Biggest Island Taps a Resource It’s Always Had