For the past 40 years, at least, Iranian intellectuals have been struggling with the relationship between Western ideas and those of their own culture. Most have avoided the extremes of either full identification with the West or full retreat to "traditional" values. Instead, the majority found in the West ideas of struggle, resistance, self-assertion, and patriotism that they wedded to pride in their own culture to create a kind of "nativism." This was a congenial intellectual outlook for those who rejected the imperial pretensions of the West, and it was able to accommodate both populism and Islamism. The ideological matrix of the Iranian revolution owes much to the convergence of these latter two trends. The author does a fine job of highlighting the nuances of the debate among Iranian intellectuals and concludes that they fell victim to a kind of "Occidentalism" that reduced the West to a hostile "essence," much as "Orientalism" did to the East. He concludes with the hope that the nativist phase of intellectual development can be transcended as Iranians reassess their relationship to the rest of the world.
In This Review
In This Review
Most Read Articles
The Sources of Chinese Conduct
Are Washington and Beijing Fighting a New Cold War?
The Population Bust
Demographic Decline and the End of Capitalism as We Know It
How a Nazi Massacre Came to Be Remembered as Its Opposite
The Dictators’ Last Stand
Why the New Autocrats Are Weaker Than They Look
The Vigilante President
How Duterte’s Brutal Populism Conquered the Philippines