Like many scholars these days, Khalidi rejects any notion of a fixed, unchanging Palestinian identity, arguing that all identities are "constructed," woven from multiple "narratives." In the late nineteenth century, most of those who lived in Palestine were simultaneously aware of themselves as Ottomans, Arabs, Muslims, or Christians, members of different extended families, and so forth. But already a sense of "Palestinianness" can be detected, and not only at the level of the elite. Indeed, Khalidi argues that the elite sometimes became aware of the specificity of Palestinian identity as poor peasants were forced from their land by arriving Zionist colonizers and became radicalized. Khalidi does not accept the view that Palestinian nationalism was merely a response to Zionism, but he does appreciate the importance of the intense struggle between them, which has made it particularly difficult to see Palestinian identity as distinct. The study is best in its analysis of the years leading up to the 1930s. It is a major contribution to historical understanding of Palestinian nationalism.
In This Review
In This Review
Most Read Articles
When Stalin Faced Hitler
Who Fooled Whom?
Greece’s New Groove
Why Athens Is No Longer Europe’s Black Sheep
The Right Way to Deal With Huawei
The United States Needs to Compete With Chinese Firms, Not Just Ban Them
How Iran Sees Its Standoff With the United States
And What Trump Should Do to Solve the Problem He Created
The Lost Art of American Diplomacy
Can the State Department Be Saved?