A beautifully crafted examination, rich in argument and historical detail, of the traditions of American foreign policy. The author, the editor of Orbis and a professor at the University of Pennsylvania, consigns to deserved oblivion various shopworn antinomies customarily employed to understand U.S. foreign policy. His new scaffolding identifies a set of four "perfectly proportioned" traditions from the early republic, and he uses these to evaluate twentieth-century diplomacy, particularly all varieties of Wilsonianism and "Global Meliorism," in highly unflattering (and very witty) terms. McDougall's chapters on the follies of the crusading impulse in this century are gems, but he misses elements in the late eighteenth- and nineteenth-century tradition (like the emphasis on the law of nations and the intense interest in federative systems among sovereign republics) that are vital to understanding it. If we are to appeal to the past to chart the future, that past -- and not simply Unilateralism and Nationalism, in accents of "Don't Tread on Me!" -- is entitled to remembrance too.
In This Review
In This Review
Most Read Articles
When Stalin Faced Hitler
Who Fooled Whom?
Trump’s Incendiary Rhetoric Is Only Accelerating Immigration
The Crisis at the Border Is of Washington’s Own Making
Greece’s New Groove
Why Athens Is No Longer Europe’s Black Sheep
How Iran Sees Its Standoff With the United States
And What Trump Should Do to Solve the Problem He Created
How America Lost Faith in Expertise
And Why That's a Giant Problem