Mahoney reintroduces Solzhenitsyn as a political thinker who deserves to be included in the ranks of Raymond Aron, Jacques Maritain, Martin Buber, and John Dewey, among others. Trying to free Solzhenitsyn from the reactionary and antediluvian reputation he has in the West, Mahoney highlights his deeper commitment to government under the rule of law and the right of "every private citizen" to "independence and space." At Solzhenitsyn's core, says the author, is the desire to rescue humankind's spiritual being, drawing it away from the cult of "well-being" and the humanity-reducing effect of "modern technical and social progress." Above all, he would vanquish ideology, that most pernicious product of the Enlightenment, with its arrogant and limitless inhumanity justified in the name of "Historical Necessity." Solzhenitsyn (and Mahoney, one suspects) would put at the center of this new order not so much the "destiny, fate, and progress" of the individual but the "individual soul."
In This Review
In This Review
Most Read Articles
What Really Happened in Iran
The CIA, the Ouster of Mosaddeq, and the Restoration of the Shah
How America Lost Faith in Expertise
And Why That's a Giant Problem
Why the Strait of Hormuz Is Still the World’s Most Important Chokepoint
And Why the United States Should Guarantee Its Security
When Stalin Faced Hitler
Who Fooled Whom?
How Iran Sees Its Standoff With the United States
And What Trump Should Do to Solve the Problem He Created