Less remarkable but more widely read are the reflections of these two long-time critics of American foreign policy. Neither book represents its author's finest work. Chomsky has thrown a series of interviews into rough order and Vidal's essays fall considerably short of his usual polished standard. At first glance, Chomsky's truculent tu quoque and Vidal's elegiac regrets for lost republican serenity have little in common. Yet both share a common, bedrock assumption that American activism around the world exacerbates international problems. Virtually all of U.S. foreign policy difficulties can be traced to the evil consequences of Washington's past actions; indeed, American shortsightedness (and corporate greed) wantonly challenges the natural balance of power in the world. Nevertheless, Chomsky and Vidal write with verve, passion, and style that complement their controversial views. Outside the United States, even mainstream political figures and serious specialists often regard them as authoritative. If those who believe that American activism is necessary and beneficial for the world want a more sympathetic international hearing, they must argue as forcefully as Chomsky -- and write as well as Vidal.
In This Review
In This Review
Most Read Articles
Taiwan’s Defense Strategy Doesn’t Make Military Sense
But It Does Make Political Sense
What Would It Take for Iran’s President to Meet With Trump?
Tehran Needs to Know Washington’s Word Counts for Something
Coming Soon to the United Nations: Chinese Leadership and Authoritarian Values
As Washington Steps Back, Beijing Will Take Charge
The Population Bust
Demographic Decline and the End of Capitalism as We Know It
What a War With Iran Would Look Like
Neither Side Wants a Fight, but That Doesn’t Eliminate the Danger