Economic sanctions have a mixed record as a tool of statecraft. The realities of globalization and U.S. preeminence have complicated their use, even as the threats of terrorism and weapons proliferation have made them a vital instrument of national security. In this important reexamination of recent cases, O'Sullivan offers fresh insights about when and how sanctions work. She offers detailed analysis of sanctions against Iran, Iraq, Libya, and Sudan and argues that their success has hinged on a range of factors, particularly on how well a sanctions regime suits specific policy objectives; regime change, containment, and pressuring foreign-policy change each requires its own strategy. Although multilateral sanctions are desirable, O'Sullivan argues that there are still cases in which the United States might want to employ sanctions unilaterally, especially when they are only one part of a broader strategy. This shrewd book is likely to be the authoritative guide to the sanctions debate for some time.
In This Review
In This Review
Most Read Articles
Why the Strait of Hormuz Is Still the World’s Most Important Chokepoint
And Why the United States Should Guarantee Its Security
How America Lost Faith in Expertise
And Why That's a Giant Problem
Trump’s Incendiary Rhetoric Is Only Accelerating Immigration
The Crisis at the Border Is of Washington’s Own Making
When Stalin Faced Hitler
Who Fooled Whom?
How Iran Sees Its Standoff With the United States
And What Trump Should Do to Solve the Problem He Created