Israeli military historian van Creveld's plan for peace is to get out of the Palestinian territories occupied since the June 1967 war and complete the building of the wall. After 1967, Israel was attracted to the concept of achieving more "defensible borders," but plans along those lines have not worked out to Israel's advantage. Better, then, to return to the defense of an Israel within its pre-1967 borders. Israel's clear technological advantage over all its neighbors takes care of conventional threats, but putting down militarily insignificant terrorist or guerrilla activity is demonstrably costly in both manpower and morale. Citing the Great Wall of China, the Berlin Wall, and the line dividing Greeks and Turks in Cyprus, van Creveld argues that a wall will do the job. This "controversial plan," set within an excellent succinct survey of Israeli military doctrine and practice since 1967, actually reflects emerging mainstream Israeli thinking-for better or worse.
In This Review
In This Review
Most Read Articles
When Stalin Faced Hitler
Who Fooled Whom?
Trump’s Incendiary Rhetoric Is Only Accelerating Immigration
The Crisis at the Border Is of Washington’s Own Making
Greece’s New Groove
Why Athens Is No Longer Europe’s Black Sheep
How Iran Sees Its Standoff With the United States
And What Trump Should Do to Solve the Problem He Created
How America Lost Faith in Expertise
And Why That's a Giant Problem