McCargo's close study of the origins of militancy in three southern Thai provinces carries clues to the problem of state-minority relations all over Asia. Based on a year's fieldwork, interrogation records, and anonymous leaflets, among other sources, McCargo's book argues that Thailand's overcentralized state failed to give meaningful participation to ethnically Malay Muslim citizens. The resulting popular alienation led to the violence that has been going on in Thailand since 2001. Former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra's regime, although popularly elected, was especially inept in relations with local minorities. The chapter on police and army action is a case study on how to make local insurgencies worse instead of better. In McCargo's account, Islamic identity provided a frame -- but not the motive -- for the militant movement. But if autonomy short of independence is the demand of many groups in Asia, it remains unclear to McCargo, and perhaps to the southern Thai militants themselves, how much local participation is enough to stem this kind of violence once it starts.
In This Review
In This Review
Most Read Articles
When Stalin Faced Hitler
Who Fooled Whom?
Greece’s New Groove
Why Athens Is No Longer Europe’s Black Sheep
The Right Way to Deal With Huawei
The United States Needs to Compete With Chinese Firms, Not Just Ban Them
How Iran Sees Its Standoff With the United States
And What Trump Should Do to Solve the Problem He Created
The Lost Art of American Diplomacy
Can the State Department Be Saved?