Despite being a poor, agrarian society, Anderson argues, Nicaragua is progressing toward democracy because Nicaraguans possess the right civic virtues: inclinations toward mutual cooperation with and trust in their fellow citizens. More controversially, Anderson claims that the Sandinista revolution -- arising from grass-roots organizations and advancing ideals of social justice -- greatly enhanced that social capital. She argues that Argentina, in contrast, despite its relative wealth, is less democratic than it ought to be because Argentines -- especially the political heirs to Juan Perón's semi-fascism -- are distrustful and hence not inclined to democratic participation and peaceful compromise. Still, Argentine checks and balances have restrained the authoritarian tendencies of Perón's followers -- a demonstration that states can construct "institutional capital," such as strong parliaments and legal systems, that resist tyranny. Skeptical readers may find Anderson's empirical tests a bit thin, but Social Capital in Developing Democracies, always spirited and stimulating, is a valuable addition to the literature on the multiple pillars of democratic development.
Get the best of Foreign Affairs' book reviews delivered to you.
More Reviews on Western Hemisphere From This Issue