Since the 2008 financial crisis and the ensuing global recession, unemployment has risen almost everywhere, and governments have become increasingly wary of allowing capital to freely cross international boundaries, partly because they see such movement as a potential source of instability and partly because capital inflows can strengthen currencies, which can further harm employment. The authors of this study examine various efforts to restrict both inflows and outflows and are left troubled by the potential effects of overly aggressive restrictions. They distinguish between good and bad controls on cross-border movements of capital, although they concede the distinction is not always clear. They also urge the negotiation of an international code of conduct -- analogous to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade enforced by the World Trade Organization -- that would establish rules (or at least guidelines) to prevent undesirable capital controls, particularly those that distort trade, and actively encourage desirable ones, particularly those that foster financial stability.
In This Review
In This Review
Most Read Articles
When Stalin Faced Hitler
Who Fooled Whom?
Greece’s New Groove
Why Athens Is No Longer Europe’s Black Sheep
The Right Way to Deal With Huawei
The United States Needs to Compete With Chinese Firms, Not Just Ban Them
How Iran Sees Its Standoff With the United States
And What Trump Should Do to Solve the Problem He Created
The Lost Art of American Diplomacy
Can the State Department Be Saved?